翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Matthews House
・ Matthews Island
・ Matthews Kambale
・ Matthews Kempson
・ Matthews Motshwarateu
・ Matthews Peak
・ Matthews Place
・ Matthews Point
・ Matthews Range
・ Matthews Ridge
・ Matthews State Forest
・ Matthews Temane
・ Matthews Township
・ Matthews v Chicory Marketing Board (Vic)
・ Matthews v Kent and Medway Towns Fire Authority
Matthews v United Kingdom
・ Matthews' Southern Comfort (album)
・ Matthews, Georgia
・ Matthews, Indiana
・ Matthews, Maryland
・ Matthews, Missouri
・ Matthews, New Jersey
・ Matthews, North Carolina
・ Matthews, Texas
・ Matthews, Wright & King
・ Matthewson
・ Matthey's mouse
・ Matthias
・ Matthias (brother of Josephus)
・ Matthias (father of Josephus)


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Matthews v United Kingdom : ウィキペディア英語版
Matthews v United Kingdom
''Matthews v United Kingdom'' is a human rights case (18 February 1999) on the right to vote, under the European Convention on Human Rights.
Gibraltarians although EU citizens under the British Treaty of Accession, were unable to vote in elections for the European Parliament. Gibraltar is bound by EU laws and has implemented EU legislation fully and promptly, yet Gibraltarians and other EU nationals resident in Gibraltar had been denied the vote in elections for the European Assembly. The reason given was that the British Government had failed to make the necessary legal arrangements, and declined to do so.
Lord Bethell moved an amendment to the 1998 European Parliamentary Elections Bill in the House of Lords to make a provision for the right to vote, but it was defeated by the Labour Government supported by the Liberal Democrats.
The Gibraltar Self-Determination Group (SDGG) took the case to the European Court of Human Rights, and won a landmark decision.
The applicant, Denise Matthews, is a British citizen and resident of Gibraltar. In April 1994 she applied to be registered as a voter in the elections to the European Parliament. She was told that under the terms of the EC Act on Direct Elections of 1976 Gibraltar was not included in the franchise for those elections.
The applicant claimed that the absence of elections in Gibraltar to the European Parliament was in violation of her right to participate in elections to choose the legislature under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1. She also alleged a violation of Article 14 on the ground that she was entitled to vote in European Parliament elections anywhere in the European Union where she lived except in Gibraltar. It was common ground that Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 applied in Gibraltar.〔(Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights: ''Matthews v the United Kingdom'' )〕
As a consequence of this decision in 1999 and after consultation by the Electoral Commission, Gibraltar was included in the South West England constituency for the European Parliament election in 2004.
Spain took a complaint about Gibraltar participating in EU elections to the European Court of Justice, the European Union’s high court, but this was unsuccessful.〔(Judgment of the European Court of Justice: ''Spain v United Kingdom'' (C-145/04) )〕
==See also==

* Law of Gibraltar

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Matthews v United Kingdom」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.